Noticeboard

Clerks' noticeboard (shortcut WP:AC/CN)

Clerks' Noticeboard

Request name	Motions	Initiated	Votes
Wikipediocracy-related conduct		21 October 2024	4/1/2
Marine 69-71	Motions	26 October 2024	0/0/0

[edit]

Open cases

Case name	Links	Evidence due	Prop. Dec. due
Backlash to diversity and inclusion	(t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t)	10 Oct 2024	24 Oct 2024

[edit]

Recently closed cases (Past cases)

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Clarification and Amendment requests

Request name	Motions	Case	Posted
Amendment request: Palestine-Israel articles (AE referral)	Motion	(orig. case)	17 August 2024

Arbitrator motions

No arbitrator motions are currently open.

This noticeboard's primary purpose is to to attract the attention of the clerks to a particular matter by non-clerks. Non-clerks are welcome to comment on this page in the event that the clerks appear to have missed something.

Private matters

The clerks may be contacted privately, in the event a matter could not be prudently addressed publicly (i.e., on this page), by composing an email to clerks-llists.wikimedia.org; only the clerk team and individual arbitrators have access to emails sent to that list.

Procedures

A procedural reference for clerks (and arbitrators) is located here.

Archives

1 (to 26 January 2006)
2 (to 28 January 2006)
3 (archive of a discussion started on January 29, 2006 at the incidents noticeboard)
4 (to 28 January 2006)
Old noticeboard #1 (February 2006→December 2008, clerks' coordination board)
Old noticeboard #2 (December 2008→March 2010, clerks' coordination board)
5 (January 2006→May 2009)
6 (May 2009→June 2012, noticeboard merged)
7 (June 2012→September 2014)
8 (September 2014→September 2015)
9 (3 October→4 November 2015)
10 (October 2015→March 2021)
11 (April 2021→present)

This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by when more than 2 sections are present.

Arbitrators, clerks and trainees: Please coordinate your actions through the mailing list. The purpose of this page is for editors who are not clerks to request clerk assistance.

Broken implementation notes

I happened to be reading back some of the recent cases, and I noticed that the implementation notes for this page all consider themselves passing, even though that wasn't the case. This hasn't broken for this more recent case so I'm not sure what went wrong here and definitely don't want to go touching it myself. 195.195.244.151 (talk) 13:34, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The implementation notes hadn't been completely substituted on that first case, so once the casenav data for the number of active arbitrators was no longer available, it treated it as having 0 active arbitrators, and 1 support become enough to show as passing. I have fixed it on that page by adding |active= 11 to each proposal (and also subst'ed it for good measure). Thanks, SilverLocust 💬 16:09, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

discrepancy in implementation notes in Backlash to Diversity and Inclusion

The proposed remedy contentious topic (yasuke) is logged as having no support votes, but it should be logged as having one. Apologies if this is the wrong place to put this. beepboopbwaph (talk) 15:23, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, fixed. SilverLocust 💬 16:10, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]